I fear that more such episodes will be shot within protected areas around the world, more such carefully planned ‘Man vs Wild’ adventures will be led into wildlife habitats for the “larger good”, and more people will be led to believe that shows like this should be emulated in real life to experience “truer” forms of adventure when, in reality, human-centric arrogance lies at the core of such productions. I fail to see why this “awareness” had to be raised from within the boundaries of a protected wildlife habitat with a ‘Man vs Wild’ format. I was also informed that your episode with Grylls is about raising awareness about water conservation. Nevertheless, the team claimed success with the PM Modi episode, saying it “generated much desired attention on conservation of wildlife”. Where is this “larger good”? How is disturbing wildlife habitats with unnecessary intrusions serving a “larger good”?
BEST MAN VS WILD EPISODE TV
The Discovery press team said that you agreed to make your TV debut with Into the Wild because you believe that it is “a truly unique show” that offers “adrenaline-pumping action” and also “lends itself beautifully to driving a specific purpose for the larger good of society”. So, what kind of message do you think this ‘Man vs Wild’ theme sends about wildlife conservation?Īlso Read: Why conservationists are upset with Rajinikanth, Akshay Kumar & Bear Grylls of Man vs Wildīandipur is also a tiger reserve and I’d hate to see Grylls walking around the area with a spear. Sheer stupidity aside, such attitudes go directly against conservation values. What I cannot understand is, why Bear Grylls? Why work with someone who thinks of our shared space as ‘Man vs Wild’? It’s a format that pushes for a confrontational attitude where people are encouraged to enter wildlife habitats - like Bandipur and Corbett that are legally protected, especially for wildlife - and then get into “battle-mode”. 500.Now, I am sure that you are aware of all of this. In the end, just a very good game by Reich, and the Colts are once again above. Perhaps he could have benched Eric Fisher in order to at least try Matt Pryor at left tackle to see if he is any better (not like he can be any worse). Perhaps giving Taylor so many touches after the game was essentially over was not the smartest choice, considering the Colts’ entire offense depends on the guy. Now, Indy is heading into the bye week in good spirits, ready to rest up and prepare for a key game against the New England Patriots.Ĭolts won 31-0, so there are no meaningful things to fault Reich for. The Colts just managed their business, and they limited stupid turnovers while never allowing the Texans offense to get into a rhythm. In the end, Reich just needed to be patient and let the game develop, and there was no way that the Colts were coming out of Houston with a loss. This game was never truly in doubt, as the Colts have just way more talent than the Texans, and are also much healthier. In the end, the Texans’ veteran quarterback finished the game completing just 5/13 passes for 45 yards and an interception before being benched for Davis Mills. Taylor never looked comfortable, and the connection with his receivers was clearly not there.
Matt Eberflus dialed up the perfect game plan against the mobile quarterback, managing to limit the short passes and keeping him in the pocket. Tyrod Taylor has been good for the Texans this season, and, when healthy, he has been able to give the Texans’ offense a few good plays here and there each game to put some points on the board. Other than Pittman, no other Colts’ receiver has been productive this season, so getting him going is very important. The Colts’ #1 receiver not only had a team-high 8 targets but also had two carries for 33 yards. had been in a bit of a slump over the past couple of weeks, and it looked like Reich really wanted to get MPJ going in order to break out of said slump before the most important stretch of games of the season.